[plt-scheme] SXML or XEXPR? SXML pattern-matching?

From: Andrew Reilly (andrew-scheme at areilly.bpc-users.org)
Date: Mon Jun 23 23:00:32 EDT 2008

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:29:31PM +0300, Anton Tayanovskyy wrote:
> PLT's match, on the other hand, is extremely flexible. I guess I'll
> proceed with my small macro for now (thankfully Scheme is tolerant of
> individualism).

I do a little XML parsing in my current project.  I started with
sxml and sxml-match from PLaneT, but shifted to the "batteries
included" xml and match as I ported my code to the 3.99 series.
I have found it to work beautifully, and it's quite a lot more
concise than the explicit DOM shennanigans that I had to go
through in an earlier, Python version.  The match in
scheme/match and scheme has (list-no-order ...), which is great
for attributes.



Posted on the users mailing list.