[plt-scheme] SRFI-1 move to scheme/list?

On Jan 19, 2008 2:23 PM, Michael Sperber <sperber at deinprogramm.de> wrote:
> If there are differences, and requiring (lib "1.ss" "srfi") gets you
> procedures that aren't conformant with SRFI 1, that's a big problem.  I
> recommend strongly against it.

Agreed.  To clarify my suggestion is merely that scheme/list become
more complete.  To me, complete means "does what SRFI-1 does with
appropriate changes to match existing convention in scheme/list", but
I am open to other definitions of complete, such as stealing from the
R6RS list library, or the Haskell library, or
Your-Favourite-Library-Here.

N.