[plt-scheme] Re: More pedagogic stuff

From: wooks (wookiz at hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 13 10:42:39 EDT 2008

> They just qualified themselves as such :-) And don't think ACM is any
> better.
> > It would be great to see them publish  a rejoinder from someone in
> > PLT.
> Start by writing a reader's rebuttal that points to PLT.

So if I said I wasn't qualified to do so (as I had meant to) you lot
would have said don't worry we'll help you. Ok point me to some papers/

Posted on the users mailing list.