[plt-scheme] define syntax

From: Chongkai Zhu (czhu at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Fri Nov 23 23:46:24 EST 2007


Day wrote:
> I have an interesting and curious question:
> Is it possible to define define-syntax using Scheme (without using any
> higher macros, just scheme itself)?
> You know that macros of a language is in a higher level than the
> language itself. It's said it's easy to define a low level notion in
> higher level objects, but it's hard vice versa. We can use define-
> syntax etc. to define a transformation rule. How about using scheme to
> define that that defines transformation rule?
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme

Posted on the users mailing list.