[plt-scheme] cost of closure?

From: YC (yinso.chen at gmail.com)
Date: Thu May 31 21:08:53 EDT 2007

On 5/31/07, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> > Well, I see every thread on this list as a discussion about what should
> > be in v4.0. :)
> > Don't hesitate to make specific suggestions, and we'll be sure to bring
> > up big things for discussion --- such as making pairs immutable and
> > using `#module' instead of `(module ...)'.

Will do ;)  I sure would be interested to see if anonymous struct (or tuple)
can be supported in PLT scheme, with support for ctor/dtors.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20070531/6dc6b99b/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.