[plt-scheme] Why do folks implement *dynamically* typed languages?

From: jerzy.karczmarczuk at info.unicaen.fr (jerzy.karczmarczuk at info.unicaen.fr)
Date: Thu May 31 17:09:30 EDT 2007

Matthias Felleisen writes: 

> I thought OCAML had Dynamic. 

In the sense of dynamic typing? I don't know about it.
But the Clean language, quite Haskellish in general, has now
Dynamics which is quite interesting! It permits to exchange
code AND data between applications, something Scheme was always
proud of. 

Jerzy Karczmarczuk 

Posted on the users mailing list.