[plt-scheme] Why do folks implement *dynamically* typed languages?

From: Chris Uzdavinis (chris at atdesk.com)
Date: Thu May 31 08:38:38 EDT 2007

hendrik at topoi.pooq.com writes:

>> Do you mean type Dynamic? -- Matthias
> I suppose it could be called that.  DO you know languages that
> actually do this?

C++ doesn't have such a feature built-in, but it's implemented in the
Boost library and called an "any".


Posted on the users mailing list.