[plt-scheme] Why do folks implement *dynamically* typed languages?

From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org)
Date: Wed May 30 18:09:11 EDT 2007

That is what I don't understand. It is so seemingly obvious that it is
better to have Sl, yet, the latest hot language that everyone wants to
know and love is Ruby, which is a DL. Is it mass hysteria or what is

On 5/30/07, Michael Vanier <mvanier at cs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> How about modular type systems?  Import this module, get this kind of type checking...

Posted on the users mailing list.