[plt-scheme] Why do folks implement *dynamically* typed languages?

From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org)
Date: Wed May 30 11:21:42 EDT 2007

Here is is another perspective:

If you were to set about designing a programming language, what are
the reasons for yourself or for your users that you would choose
between implementing your language as a DL or a SL?

On 5/29/07, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> Which way are you asking?  Your subject line asks one question, but
> your content asks another.  I guess you are trying to ask "why dynamic
> languages?"

Posted on the users mailing list.