[plt-scheme] Function documentation strategy?

From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org)
Date: Thu May 10 12:11:48 EDT 2007

I've noticed that in both Scheme and Haskell code, some folks document
it like this:

(() -> any) (() -> any)) [string] -> #t


n -> ls -> bool

Is there a standard approach for documenting in this style?

Posted on the users mailing list.