[plt-scheme] dots

I don't understand the reason to  deviate from the standard
prefix notation in scheme.

Why not use

(. a b)

??

--hans
 

Jos Koot schreef:
> Interested in structs with multiple supertypes and dot-notation? I 
> call them 'records'. Be my guest at:
> http://www.telefonica.net/web2/koot/records.zip (40 kb, source code 
> plus documentation (msword))
> Kind regards, Jos Koot
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20070611/fe70feb4/attachment.html>