[plt-scheme] Why do folks implement *dynamically* typed languages?

From: hendrik at topoi.pooq.com (hendrik at topoi.pooq.com)
Date: Fri Jun 1 09:27:54 EDT 2007

On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:06:53PM -0400, Anton van Straaten wrote:
> That issue alone can make the argument for a language like Ruby, or 
> Scheme, in many cases.  Languages that put you in control in the way 
> that DLs do have been called "freedom languages":
>   http://codecraft.info/index.php/archives/20/

I've heard languages tha put you in control that SLs do called 
"police-state languages".

-- hendrik

Posted on the users mailing list.