[plt-scheme] Smallest set of operators

On 2/2/07, Dave Griffiths <dave at pawfal.org> wrote:
>
> I found this an interesting read when pondering such questions myself:
> http://www.paulgraham.com/rootsoflisp.html
>
> The answer does seem to be around 7...
>

Well, I have already read that some years ago... hummf, maybe that's
where my '7' came from... heh. But if I remember correctly that was
more directed to Lisp / Common Lisp than Scheme itself. Well, better
read it again. Thank you for the reference.

> :)
>
> cheers,
>
> dave
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of Southampton, UK