[plt-scheme] module question

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Mon May 29 12:42:28 EDT 2006

At Mon, 29 May 2006 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Danny Yoo wrote:
> I get the feeling that this has something to do 
> with the "hopelessness" of the toplevel.


> 'a' should have 
> treated a as an unbound.

There's no distinction between a reference to the top-level variable
`a' and a reference to an unbound `a'.


Posted on the users mailing list.