[plt-scheme] define/public doesn't like my macro

From: Robby Findler (robby at cs.uchicago.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 8 09:49:55 EDT 2006

On Jun 8, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:

> On 08/06/06, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> But I think it's important to distinguish methods from procedures.
> But it doesn't seem consistent.
> Since you can do (foo ...) but not (for-each foo ...) so one might say
> procedures and methods are only half distinguished. I would prefer to
> do an explicit call to the method and probably have for-each/method,
> or map/method if I want to have higher order procedures over methods.
> Probably overkill but it would be more consistent, imho.

The second requires a closure allocation and the first doesn't.


Posted on the users mailing list.