[plt-scheme] xxx chooses MzScheme as preferred language

On Jun 2, 2006, at 4:59 AM, Paulo J. Matos wrote:

> On 01/06/06, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>>
>> My main conclusion: if someone wants to improve the MzScheme results,
>> consider starting with the Chicken code (and dump mzc after v301).
>>
>
> What do you mean? Extending Chicken to support all PLT Scheme and  
> forget mzc?

Start with the code that was submitted for Chicken on the shootout page.

And forget mzc after v301 because its not producing competitive code;  
go back and read Matthew's results that he posted in the email.

-Felix