[plt-scheme] macros for macros

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 21 11:18:03 EDT 2005

At 21 Jul 2005 10:02:51 -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Why doesn't this work?

Because `define-syntax-for-syntax' would require
`require-for-syntax-for-syntax' or nested `begin-for-syntax', and the
current module/syntax implementation can't deal with arbitrarily many
phases in a single module.

> Must I put the
> definition of x in its own module, and require-for-syntax it?

Yes, unfortunately.


Posted on the users mailing list.