[plt-scheme] a MUCH SIMPLER question about efficiency

From: Joe Marshall (jrm at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon May 17 08:24:19 EDT 2004

Paulo Jorge de Oliveira Cantante de Matos <pocm at netvisao.pt> writes:

>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> Hi,
> Would it be considered cheating if an implementation used double linked
> lists to implement lists in scheme so that an implementation of last
> gets much faster?

What's wrong with cheating so long as you don't change the semantics?

I don't think you'd get much benefit by adding the complexity of

Posted on the users mailing list.