[plt-scheme] Re: function contracts

From: David Van Horn (dvanhorn at cs.uvm.edu)
Date: Fri Mar 12 16:09:02 EST 2004

David Van Horn wrote:
> In this case the function must be defined to take any number of
> arguments, but I'd like to provide such a contract on a procedure of
> arity 2 without changing the procedure's definition.  Is this possible?

This can easily be done using rename.  Sorry for the noise.


Posted on the users mailing list.