[plt-scheme] naming convention for structure constructor vs. wrapper?

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Fri Jul 2 07:36:28 EDT 2004

One of my students has just had this need to use structs as procedures.
Correct me if I am wrong but srfi-9 wouldn't support this. -- Matthias

On Jul 2, 2004, at 4:13 AM, Michael Sperber wrote:

>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>>>>>> "Neil" == Neil W Van Dyke <neil at neilvandyke.org> writes:
> Neil> Most missed at the moment is subtyping.
> Neil> You'll find other useful features documented at:
> Neil> http://download.plt-scheme.org/doc/mzscheme/mzscheme-Z-H-4.html
> I know the docs fairly well, but I was asking what *you* miss.
> (Subtyping is something I've never missed so far.)
> How about writing up a SRFI based on your experience?
> -- 
> Cheers =8-} Mike
> Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Posted on the users mailing list.