[plt-scheme] changes to file-position aren't captured by read-syntax ?

On Jan 22, 2004, at 11:39 AM, Felix Klock's plt proxy wrote:
>
> note that while all of the s1/s2/s3's are internally consistent, test 
> two is totally out of whack with respect to the original file (and so 
> my stack traces will still be totally goofy)

An addendum: test two is only out of whack on its line and column 
number information; I think the positions it lists are fine.


A new question: why must the offset-list argument to read-syntax 
provide column and line number information?
I'm not sure I want to take the time to make line and column numbers 
work, and I know that the DrScheme stack traces can get by with only 
position info, so why is the interface for read-syntax forcing me to 
provide bogus line and column numbers when all I want to do is override 
the position info for the syntax objects I read in?

-Felix

----
"I'm faithful...to both of them!"  -jgreenberg