[plt-scheme] Re: BUG: 206, modules and SRFI 1

From: Michael Sperber (sperber at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de)
Date: Thu Feb 12 17:04:19 EST 2004

>>>>> "Robby" == Robby Findler <robby at cs.uchicago.edu> writes:

Robby> >From what I can tell, it seems like the right extensions to `require'
Robby> would do the trick. In principle, require is extensible so it might
Robby> even be feasible to come up with a prototype implementation of the new
Robby> require.

Yes; for example, the structure calculus in Scheme 48 makes this kind
of thing way more painless.

Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Posted on the users mailing list.