| From: Shriram Krishnamurthi (sk at cs.brown.edu) Date: Thu Feb 12 15:36:14 EST 2004 |
|
Daniel Silva wrote: > [XUL] > Did they find it missing functionality, too slow, or both? Missing functionality, mainly. I don't think the performance evaluation was substantial enough to be meaningful. > If you open Mozilla Firebird (Firefox?)'s browser.jar you'll see its UI > is really browser.xul, and the browser doesn't seem slow to me. True; I use Firebird as my regular browser. But it's also fairly primitive, visually. Shriram
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}