| From: Paul Steckler (steck at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Fri May 9 12:28:03 EDT 2003 |
|
I have a syntax-rules macro that expands into a top-level
definition, something like
(define-syntax foo
(syntax-rules ()
[(_ name e1 e2)
(define name (bar e1 e2))]))
Except I don't really want to define `name', I want
to define `name-prime'. How can I build an identifier
and still have a top-level definition?
-- Paul (who doesn't know the macro system as well as he should)
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|