[plt-scheme] Re: plt-scheme digest, Vol 1 #366 - 4 msgs

From: Pedro Pinto (ppinto at cs.cmu.edu)
Date: Tue May 6 08:19:31 EDT 2003

Yes, it should and is in the real example. I mistyped. I probably was not
very clear though: the error message I get refers to the artificial module
created by the extension not the real test.ss.

Thanks,
-pp


> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 11:46:57 +0200
> From: Katsmall the Wise <kela_bit at netvision.net.il>
> Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] abusing modules
> To: Pedro Pinto <ppinto at cs.cmu.edu>
> Cc: plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu
>
> Shouldn't the file name be either test.ss or test.scm?
> Not sure about it, though.
>
> When you (require (assembly name)), can name be "System",
> "System.Reflection", "Microsoft.DirectX" and the suchlikes?
>
> Katsmall T. Wise
>
> Pedro Pinto wrote:
>
> >This works if `test' is define and required at the top level. However
> >`(require "test")' results in an error:
> >
> >require: unknown module: <module-name>
> >
> >Any ideas as to why? I realize that this is a bit of an abuse of the
> >module system but I am somewhat infatuated with the cleanness of the
> >syntax.
> >
> >Thanks in advance,
> >-pp
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> End of plt-scheme Digest



Posted on the users mailing list.