| From: Francisco Solsona (solsona at acm.org) Date: Mon Apr 28 09:34:02 EDT 2003 |
|
Ulf Leopold <ulfleopold at yahoo.com> writes: [...] > The module in 31.ss does look a bit suspicious since > it provides an identifier that has not been defined. Right, sorry, I forgot to require the real SRFI-31 file (srfi/31/rec.ss). Fixed, and exp-tagged. --Francisco
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}