Does this mean it will it be in the next 'nightly' build? <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Neil Toronto <<a href="mailto:neil.toronto@gmail.com">neil.toronto@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I've just pushed the new 'plot' library. Eli and I both forgot that the new 'plot' still needs the old libfit, and removed it along with libplplot. I just added libfit back (the sources are in "src/fit" now instead of "src/plot/fit") along with the proper configure, Makefile.in, and get-libs.rkt changes. I can verify that libfit compiles on 64-bit Ubuntu. It *should* build on Windows and Mac. :D I've taken Matthew's suggestion to make the new 'plot' as backward-compatible as possible. Plots might still break (such as the example at <a href="http://racket-lang.org" target="_blank">racket-lang.org</a> and on the Wikipedia page). Using the 'plot/compat' module should make these work. This change replaces about 20000 lines of C+support code with 7000 lines of Racket that does a lot more. Racket code for backward compatibility totals only 500 lines. The libfit library is about 500 lines of C+make code. Neil T _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev" target="_blank">http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev</a> </blockquote></div>