<br> <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Carl Eastlund <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:carl.eastlund@gmail.com">carl.eastlund@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Robby Findler<br> <div class="im"><<a href="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</a>> wrote:<br></div> <div class="im">><br>> FWIW, rkt is much faster to type (for me) than something like scrbl<br>> because it alternates hands (on qwerty, anyways, don't know about<br>> others). The "cr" in scrbl is the truly painful part, tho.<br> <br></div>How much are we designing the name change to service the typing speed<br>of us few hardcore PLT hackers, and how much are we designing it to<br>make our system more accessible and comprehensible to outsiders? If<br> we're aiming for the former, why can't we keep ".ss"?</blockquote> <div> </div> <div>Don't you want to increase the number of hardcore hackers? ;) .racket and other long extensions just look a bit too long, especially since I generally go for small modules and that means more files. </div> <div> </div> <div>If we can use .ss I am all for it, but I can live with .rkt or other short extensions.</div> <div> </div> <div>My 2 cents. Cheers.</div> <div>yc</div> <div> </div> <div> </div></div>