Matthew,<br><br>Do you think you can sneak in unsafe-fx-abs and unsafe-fl-abs? It's a pretty common function - at least in the science collection - that I assume would compile nicely. [I promise not to ask for too many of these.]<br>
<br>Doug<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Matthew Flatt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mflatt@cs.utah.edu">mflatt@cs.utah.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
`inexact-real?'<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:47:35 -0400, Doug Williams wrote:<br>
> Is there an existing contract to check for a float? For example, mean would<br>
> now be guaranteed to return a float instead of a real. It would be nice to<br>
> specify this is the contract.<br>
><br>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Matthew Flatt <<a href="mailto:mflatt@cs.utah.edu">mflatt@cs.utah.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > At Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:29:01 -0400, Doug Williams wrote:<br>
> > > Are the basic unsafe-fl, unsafe-fx, and unsafe-vector-ref operations<br>
> > > included in 4.2.2?<br>
> ><br>
> > Yes --- except for `unsafe-fx->fl', which is new in 4.2.2.3.<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>