[racket-dev] Things we could move out of the core

What does being "so fundamental" have to do with being in the core vs being
in a package?  We should not confuse putting things in packages with making
them second-class concepts.  We can put racket/sandbox in a package without
necessarily making it any less fundamental to Racket.

Carl Eastlund

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu>wrote:

>
> In general I agree with Robby on "the definition of the core as "minimum
> stuff to get pkgs running" and we should be picky about what goes in". BUT,
> as a small addendum, I think the idea of sandboxing is so fundamental, I'd
> rather see the idea (not necessarily the current implementation) become a
> part of the core.
>
> -- Matthias
>
>
> _________________________
>   Racket Developers list:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20130626/b8b68cd4/attachment.html>