[racket-dev] [plt] Push #26372: master branch updated

On Feb 27, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:

> 
> "Cross-phase-persistence-inducing" would be an accurate description,
> but that's a mouthful. Is there a short variant that connects to
> existing terminology better than "phase-collapsing"?


1. cropping [seriously]

2. I would stay away from characterizing a product via the absence of a property (phaseless). 

3. On many occasions people ascribe a property to a description of a collection of artifacts that exists only in each and every artifact. This is especially true in CS/PL/OO. In this spirit, "cross-phase persistent module declaration" would work. 

4. I still like phase-neutral because it is shorter and inspires the right kind of thought.