[racket-dev] indentation: the rb tree didn't help, but a hack to stick-to-next-sexp might

> and call it a bunch (inside an 'or', one branch for each of those
> strings that are currently in the second argument to member; or well,
> even use a for/or, I guess). Or, if you wanted, you could change your
> existing code to push the 'or' inside the 'and' and then drop the
> promise.
>


Ok, I'll rewrite the code without the promise, and push to master.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20121126/7f0ab22e/attachment-0001.html>