[racket-dev] `compatibility' (was: [plt] Push #25038: master branch updated)

From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue Jul 31 12:26:56 EDT 2012

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> To start afresh, here are two suggestions, which are mutually
> exclusive. The first is my preference:
>  1. Revert the addition of `compatibility/package' and
>     `compatibility/mpair', including the documentation changes (but
>     maybe add back some text to discourage misuse of these libraries).

I definitely think we should keep `mpair` as a more-than-compatibility
library.  It's useful in real data structures, and it's nice not to
have to roll your own mutable linked list when it's the right choice.
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu

Posted on the dev mailing list.