[racket-dev] [plt] Push #24958: master branch updated

From: James Swaine (james.swaine at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Fri Jul 13 14:57:06 EDT 2012

I don't know if there's consensus here yet, but it seems like the best
thing is to move racket/future/visualizer into a top-level:
future-visualizer.  Then racket/future/trace will become
future-visualizer/trace.  If that sounds reasonable, I'll go ahead and move

On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> <matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> > All I regret is that we have a very shallow structure now, and I think
> it would have helped if we had stuck to about a dozen or so categories
> after all.
> I think the "modern" experience is that a flat hierarchy (or perhaps
> one with foo/test foo/private, etc) plus tagging / searching works
> very well.
> So maybe we should try to add some better tagging/searching instead of
> trying to some hierarchy in there?
> Robby
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev/archive/attachments/20120713/d7acd083/attachment.html>

Posted on the dev mailing list.