[racket-dev] first and rest in racket/base

From: Asumu Takikawa (asumu at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 13 14:13:40 EST 2012

On 2012-12-13 12:44:38 -0500, Vincent St-Amour wrote:
> Does this sound reasonable?

+1. While we're at it, might as well also put at least `empty` and
`empty?` in there too. These trip me up as well.

Cheers,
Asumu

Posted on the dev mailing list.