[racket-dev] ACM publishing and ArXiv

ACM conference also classify your paper so 
that people who look for related work and
may not have quite the right keywords find
it anyway. 

;; --- 

Yesterday Stephen found a paper on tracing 
in a lazy language that, despite its title, 
and despite claims in the introduction, 
comes awfully close to what John published
in essence in ESOP '01. 

But they wrote it in 98 or so. 

Why didn't we find it? The authors published
in some obscure Australian conference. 



On Sep 30, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Jon Rafkind wrote:

> So what exactly is the benefit of publishing with ACM these days? Is it just to prove that your paper was peer reviewed?
> 
> On 09/30/2011 12:02 PM, John Clements wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 2011, at 10:07 AM, John Clements wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> In case you didn't catch Stephanie Weirich's post of this on plus.google.com, here's some very interesting information about ArXiv and ACM and where copyrights intersect.
>>> 
>>> It may be that you can avoid much of this by only publishing "draft" versions of your paper on ArXiv; I Am Not A Lawyer.
>>> 
>> Oh for heaven's sake.  Neglected to post the link.
>> 
>> 
>> http://r6.ca/blog/20110930T012533Z.html
>> 
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _________________________________________________
>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>   
>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
> 
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev