[racket-dev] racket/match is broken

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Sat Oct 8 12:17:09 EDT 2011

On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:48 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:

> Okay. I think it is strange, but feel free to do that and revert my
> change. Apologies for the confusion.

I think you shouldn't apologize here. I am unhappy that match
doesn't guarantee order of matching in a list. The entire reason
I use lists is that I want left-to-right traversals. If I don't
I use 'no order' patterns. 

Sam should change the implementation not the documentation. 

-- Matthias

Posted on the dev mailing list.