[racket-dev] racket/match is broken

From: Prabhakar Ragde (plragde at uwaterloo.ca)
Date: Thu Oct 6 14:04:58 EDT 2011

Sam wrote:

> Unlike, say, `syntax-parse', `match' isn't designed for the use-case
> of building ASTs while matching.

Wait, what? That's exactly what I want to use it for when writing toy 
interpreters for pedagogical purposes. Or am I misunderstanding what 
you're saying here? I want to do PLAI-style things, but with `match' 
instead of `type-case'. --PR

Posted on the dev mailing list.