[racket-dev] `letrec' and continuations

From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Fri May 20 19:18:56 EDT 2011

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> At Fri, 20 May 2011 16:39:23 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> 2. The semantics for internal defines would be more Algol like, meaning your
>> example would immediately behave like let and thus be fast.
> Ok, I see how that's a better way of saying what I agree with (i.e.,
> what I think Robby suggested).

(And indeed, what I meant to suggest :).


Posted on the dev mailing list.