[racket-dev] `letrec' and continuations

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Fri May 20 12:39:42 EDT 2011

At Fri, 20 May 2011 10:55:36 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
> Can we really change the semantics of letrec in such a fundamental way?

Sure. :)  But it's easier to not change `letrec', of course.

Posted on the dev mailing list.