[racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

From: Justin Zamora (justin at zamora.com)
Date: Wed May 4 19:31:55 EDT 2011

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:20 AM, D Herring <dherring at tentpost.com> wrote:
> You might emphasize that Racket is a "new language, borrowing the best parts
> of Scheme (and other languages?) and extending it with these features"...

A sentence like that would be a good replacement for the awful,
"Racket is a programming language" currently on the front page of
racket-lang.org   Perhaps something like "Racket is a new language
that borrows the best parts of Scheme, Java, and other languages and
extends them with advanced features such as contracts, types,
user-defined languages, a complete GUI framework and other modern


Posted on the dev mailing list.