[racket-dev] LGPL

From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org)
Date: Thu Mar 3 22:10:00 EST 2011

About a minute ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> For people wanting to make it easy for their PLaneT packages to be
> incorporated into Racket core... should we be using LGPL 2.1, or
> some other license?
> (I've been using LGPL 3 for most things lately, but I don't mind
> going back to 2.1 if that's where Racket wants to be right now.)

To avoid such problems as recontacting people if/when the Racket
license version changes, I simply used

  Distributed under the same terms as Racket

(This includes your file, BTW, at "collects/2htdp/private/csv/csv.rkt")

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the dev mailing list.