[racket-dev] `take-until' etc

From: Jay McCarthy (jay.mccarthy at gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jun 8 09:34:50 EDT 2011

I'd really like #:unless as well


On 2011/06/08, at 9:21, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:

> Anyone seconds this?
> And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too?  (I
> know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.)
> Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote:
>> I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate.
>> 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org>:
>>> Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right'
>>> versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that?
> -- 
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the dev mailing list.