[racket-dev] `take-until' etc

From: Eli Barzilay (eli at barzilay.org)
Date: Wed Jun 8 09:21:52 EDT 2011

Anyone seconds this?

And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too?  (I
know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.)

Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I've used them before and I find they "read" better than using negate.
> 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org>:
> > Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right'
> > versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that?

          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

Posted on the dev mailing list.