[racket-dev] Blame and re-provided bindings

From: Robby Findler (robby at eecs.northwestern.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 17 09:41:46 EST 2011

So far as I understand it, we have: Stevie opposed, Matthias neutral,
Robby and Casey for, with everyone agreeing that we should try to
preserve the "Carl constraints" of 'single contract wrapper' and 'same

Note that in the current world we are *forced* to break the first of
the Carl constraints. So I consider this a bonus if we achieve it (and
so if we don't in some cases, I don't think we should care).

Is that a correct summary of the status?


Posted on the dev mailing list.