[racket-dev] Internal definitions in `define'

Does anyone know of a reason to not have an implicit `begin' in a
plain definition, translated into an implicit (let () ...) in racket?

When I see things like this:

  http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8667403

I think that people expect the syntax of `define' to be uniform, so if
you can switch these:

  (define (foo x) (+ x 1))
  (define foo (+ 8 1))

then the expectation is for the same to work when there are multiple
expressions.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!