[racket-dev] Parametric/c (was Re: [plt] Push #22411: master branch updated)

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> I think I'm not in favor of the move of parametric/c into the contract
> library. Sam and I had a discussion about this is Austin, tho, so
> maybe I'm misremembering the outcome?

One of us is definitely misremembering the outcome -- my memory was
that we decided that `parametric/c' was important and belonged
alongside `new-exists/c'.
-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu