[racket-dev] TR -> no source locations?

From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Sat Nov 20 23:19:31 EST 2010

There are a lot of things you could mean by "Typed Racket doesn't
preserve source locations".  Some of them TR definitely preserves
source locations, and some are hard cases where TR tries but doesn't
always succeed.  So I am also interested in an example.

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Carl Eastlund <cce at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> Do you have a sample program where Racket preserves source locations
> and Typed Racket doesn't?
> Carl Eastlund
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:51 PM, John Clements
> <clements at brinckerhoff.org> wrote:
>> It appears to me that TR does not preserve source locations, which makes testing extremely painful
>> (which test failed? Who knows.) I'm hoping that I'm just missing something obvious, here. I'm also in
>> the market for obvious workarounds. Apologies if this is a FAQ; I did actually google for the answer.
>> John

sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu

Posted on the dev mailing list.