[plt-dev] three more little `scheme' vs. `racket' differences

From: Justin Zamora (justin at zamora.com)
Date: Sun May 2 18:17:05 EDT 2010

Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Finally, `racket/base' (but not `scheme/base') now provides an
> `in-directory' sequence constructor, which gives you all the files,
> directories, and links within a given one, recursively traversing
> sub-directories. For example,

Could you add an optional flag to in-directory that controls whether
the directory is traversed recursively?  For some directories, I
wouldn't want files in the current directory but not the entire
directory tree.


Posted on the dev mailing list.