[plt-dev] Re: [plt-scheme] match for Promise

From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Mar 1 11:21:15 EST 2010

[changed to plt-dev]

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> [It seems to me define-coercion-match-expander is useful enough to belong in scheme/match.]
> I'm cool with that if others and Sam are. I'm also not super attached
> to the name, but it is what I thought of at the time.

I totally agree - it seems very useful.  If someone comes up with a
better name, I'll use it, otherwise I'll just add it with the current

sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu

Posted on the dev mailing list.